From Tokyo Rose to Charlie Rose- But the MSM Knows?

by leamea@aol.com

Some of you are old enough to remember Tokyo Rose, the rest of u have read about her, maybe.
Ghost of "Tokyo Rose".
Anyone who remembers anything about World War II, or has studied anything about World War II, will understand and remember that during World War II, the Japanese developed a way to demoralize the American forces. The Japanese psychological warfare experts developed a message they felt would work. They gave their psychological warfare script to their famous broadcaster "Tokyo Rose" and every day she would broadcast this same message packaged in different ways, hoping it would have a negative impact on American GI's morale. What was that demoralizing message?
It had three main points:
1. Your President is lying to you.
2. This war is illegal.
3. You cannot win the war

Does this sound familiar? Is it because Tokyo Murtha? Tokyo Dean? Tokyo Hillary? Tokyo Harry? Tokyo Teddy? Tokyo Nancy? Tokyo Durbin? Tokyo Kerry? etc. have all learned from the former enemies of our country and have picked up the same message and are broadcasting it on Tokyo Air America? Tokyo CNN? Tokyo ABC? Tokyo CBS? Tokyo NBC? Tokyo NY Times?etc.,to our troops? The only difference is that they claim to support our troops before they demoralize them. Come to think of it... Tokyo Rose told the American Troops she was on their side, also!
by leamea@aol.com
___________________________________________________________________

by GREGNYCIFF@AOL.COM

We are all use to the constant snippets and headlines by the usual suspects in the mainstream media. For those of us who like to take in to account all of the facts, our friends at Newsmax.com have uncovered some valuable information that some of the so called "military experts in front of our television screens " might want to consider” or “may intentionally ignore” as they usually do. Apparently on CNN Wednesday, in its attempt to further fuel the hatred and the unfounded conviction the mainstream media has towards our military, decided to air an interview conducted by a "Human rights organization" of a 12 year old survivor of the Haditha "massacre". The young girls name is Safa Younis, who lived to tell about the marines raid on her home after and IED hit their convoy. As we all know by now, the IED is the preferred weapon of choice among our enemies in Iraq and the leading cause of death of US troops in the nation. She told the tale of how the Marines raided her house and killed her family members in what some have called "cold blood". Yet, there was also a comment she made while describing the events which led up to the Marines storming her home that went under the radar screen of most. She described the preceding events through a translator as follows::
“I was planning to go to school. I was about to get out of bed. I knew the bomb would explode, so I covered my ears. The bomb exploded. The bomb struck an armored vehicle. I don't know if it was a Humvee or an armored vehicle. When the bomb exploded, they came straight to our house” CNN.com - Transcripts

Now it’s a pretty safe bet that those who took the time to read this far, realize the stunning acknowledgement this child made. How would this "innocent" child who's "innocent unarmed" family was "massacred" by out of control US Marines, know a bomb was about to explode, furthermore know when to cover her ears?
Newsmax has made a point to amplify the admission by this young girl yet it’s backed up by the actual transcript from CNN. Naturally the interviewer from this Human Rights organization gave an example of what might be an excuse for her admission stating "the 9-year-old got confused and got her story mixed up". The commentator from CNN asks ..."Was her expectation of the explosion a premonition, a fear based on the sound of the passing convoy? Or was it based on some knowledge?" Now it’s probably not fair to ask whether this person from CNN thinks the viewing audience was born yesterday by even injecting the possibility of a "premonition" due to the fact that we already know the answer because they continue to watch. But those of us who question the mainstream media’s objectivity won’t be fooled by this upcoming defense of this witness’s statement.
Keep this in mind and make it a point the next time somebody makes the comment "innocent unarmed family murdered in cold blood by US Marines" yet are unaware. Its more likely you will find even more entertaining reasons for this statement other than "confusion" even though all of her other descriptions of how her family was slaughtered isn't questioned by these same people or you may even hear something that tops "premonition".
by GREGNYCIFF@AOL.COM